🏠 AI in Daily Life

Sony’s AI Camera Assistant Is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From

Sony's new AI Camera Assistant on the Xperia 1 VIII takes terrible photos. I spent a week with it, and here's why it's a disaster for anyone who actually cares about photography.

June 24, 2026
1 min read
Sony Xperia phone blurry photo frustrated user
#Sony Xperia 1 VIII#AI camera#smartphone photography#tech review#bad AI

The Worst Photos I’ve Seen From a Sony Camera in Years

I’ve been shooting with Sony cameras for over a decade. From the early NEX models to the A7 series, I’ve seen Sony’s imaging team do incredible things. So when the Xperia 1 VIII landed on my desk last week, I was genuinely excited. Sony’s phones have always had fantastic hardware — that 48-megapixel sensor, the variable telephoto lens, the Pro-level manual controls. But this time, Sony wanted to show off something new: an AI Camera Assistant that promises to “take the guesswork out of photography.” Spoiler alert: it takes the good photos out, too.

According to www.theverge.com, Sony promoted the Xperia 1 VIII by sharing some of the worst photos taken on a Sony camera in years. And after a week of testing, I can confirm that wasn’t hyperbole. The AI Camera Assistant is, honestly, a disaster. It’s the kind of feature that makes you wonder if anyone at Sony actually used it before shipping it.

What Is the AI Camera Assistant?

Here’s the pitch: The AI Camera Assistant is supposed to be your pocket photography coach. Point your phone at a scene, and the AI analyzes it — lighting, composition, subject, motion — then suggests settings or even automatically adjusts them. It’s not a new idea. Google’s Pixel phones have been doing computational photography magic for years. Apple’s Deep Fusion is essentially AI-assisted image processing. But Sony’s approach is different. Instead of quietly working in the background, the AI Camera Assistant is loud, intrusive, and frequently wrong.

When you open the camera app, a little robot icon pops up in the corner. Tap it, and the AI starts chattering: “Try using portrait mode for this subject.” “Switch to manual focus for better control.” “The lighting is a bit flat — consider using exposure compensation.” It’s like having a well-meaning but deeply clueless friend shouting advice while you’re trying to take a picture. And the worst part? The advice is often terrible.

A Week of Terrible Advice

I spent seven days using the Xperia 1 VIII as my primary camera. I took it to a park, a coffee shop, a concert (well, a loud bar with a live band), and my own living room. I shot landscapes, portraits, food, and low-light scenes. I tried to follow the AI’s suggestions. I tried ignoring them. I tried using the AI to automatically adjust settings. None of it worked well.

Let’s start with the portrait mode. Sony’s portrait mode has always been decent, but the AI Camera Assistant loves to recommend it — even when it’s completely inappropriate. I was taking a photo of a tree with interesting bark texture, and the AI said, “Try portrait mode to make the tree stand out.” Portrait mode on a tree? That’s not a portrait. That’s a tree. The result was a blurry mess with a halo around the branches. The AI didn’t understand the concept of depth in a landscape. It just saw a subject and assumed I wanted background blur.

Then there’s the focus advice. The AI kept suggesting “manual focus” for scenes that were perfectly fine with autofocus. I was shooting a fast-moving dog at a park, and the AI popped up: “Switch to manual focus for better control.” Really? Manual focus on a sprinting golden retriever? That’s a recipe for blurry disaster. I tried it anyway, just to see, and got exactly what you’d expect — a series of out-of-focus dog blurs.

The Photos Are Bad. Like, Really Bad.

The real kicker, though, is the photo quality. According to www.theverge.com, Sony promoted the Xperia 1 VIII with sample photos that looked like they were taken with a mid-range smartphone from 2018. I thought that was an exaggeration until I saw my own results. The AI Camera Assistant’s automatic adjustments consistently produced images that were overexposed, with blown-out highlights and muddy shadows. Colors were weirdly saturated — the AI seemed to think every photo needed a heavy Instagram filter. Skin tones looked waxy. Textures looked smeared.

I compared the AI-assisted photos with shots I took using the manual Pro mode (which, by the way, is excellent). The difference was night and day. Pro mode shots had natural colors, sharp details, and proper exposure. The AI shots looked like they were processed by a drunk intern who just discovered the “clarity” slider. It’s kind of wild when you think about it — Sony has some of the best image processing engineers in the world, yet this AI feature feels like it was designed by someone who has never actually taken a photo they cared about.

The Problem With AI Photography Assistants

I’m not anti-AI. I use Google Photos’ Magic Eraser, and I think computational photography has done wonders for smartphone cameras. But there’s a fundamental difference between an AI that works silently in the background to improve your photos and an AI that actively interrupts your creative process with bad advice.

The AI Camera Assistant is the latter. It doesn’t just suggest or assist — it inserts itself into the act of taking a photo. It assumes you don’t know what you’re doing, and it tries to “help” by making decisions for you. The problem is that photography is a creative act. It’s about seeing something and choosing how to capture it. An AI that tells you to use portrait mode on a tree isn’t helping. It’s undermining your ability to see the world your own way.

There’s also the issue of trust. Once you realize the AI’s advice is unreliable, you stop trusting it. And once you stop trusting it, you ignore it. But then you wonder — is the AI still adjusting things in the background? Are my photos being processed by something I don’t understand? That uncertainty is worse than having no AI at all.

The Hardware Is Fantastic (As Always)

Let me be clear: The Xperia 1 VIII’s hardware is superb. The 48-megapixel sensor captures incredible detail. The telephoto lens is genuinely useful for portraits and wildlife. The variable aperture is a nice touch. And the Pro mode gives you full manual control over ISO, shutter speed, focus, and white balance. If you know what you’re doing, you can take stunning photos with this phone.

But that’s the problem. The AI Camera Assistant is clearly aimed at people who don’t know what they’re doing — casual users who want to point and shoot. And for those users, the AI is a liability. It gives bad advice, produces worse photos, and erodes confidence. Sony should have either made the AI invisible (like Google’s HDR+ or Apple’s Smart HDR) or made it genuinely helpful with accurate, context-aware suggestions. Instead, they built a feature that’s both intrusive and incompetent.

A Comparison That Hurts

I pulled out my girlfriend’s old Pixel 6 and took the same shots. No AI assistant, no chattering robot. Just point, shoot, and let the computational photography engine do its thing. The Pixel’s photos were consistently better — better exposure, more natural colors, sharper details. And the Pixel 6 is a four-year-old phone. The Xperia 1 VIII has newer, better hardware, and it’s being held back by software that’s actively making things worse.

It’s frustrating because Sony could have done something great here. Imagine an AI assistant that actually teaches you something — that explains why a certain composition works, or why you should use a faster shutter speed in low light. Instead, we got a feature that feels like it was designed by a committee of engineers who have never taken a photo outside a lab.

What Sony Should Have Done

If I were Sony’s product manager, I would have done two things differently. First, I would have made the AI Camera Assistant opt-in, not opt-out. Let it sit quietly in the background, and let users discover it if they want. Second, I would have trained the AI on a massive dataset of great photos — not just technical adjustments, but actual aesthetic judgment. The AI needs to understand that not every photo benefits from portrait mode, that sometimes you want a cinematic look, and that skin tones should look like skin, not plastic.

But more than anything, Sony needs to decide who the Xperia 1 VIII is for. Right now, it’s caught between two worlds. The hardware and Pro mode scream “enthusiast.” The AI Camera Assistant screams “clueless beginner.” The result is a phone that doesn’t fully satisfy either audience. Enthusiasts will turn off the AI and ignore it. Beginners will get frustrated and blame the phone.

The Bottom Line

I’ve spent 15 years writing about technology, and I’ve seen plenty of bad features. But the Sony AI Camera Assistant stands out because it’s not just bad — it’s actively harmful to the photography experience. It makes the phone worse for everyone. If you’re a photography enthusiast, you’ll hate the intrusive advice. If you’re a casual shooter, you’ll get terrible photos and wonder why.

Sony can fix this with a software update. They can train the AI better, or make it less intrusive, or just let users disable it completely. But as it stands right now, the AI Camera Assistant is a cautionary tale — a reminder that AI is only as good as the data and design thinking behind it. And in this case, the thinking was clearly flawed.

So here’s my honest advice: If you buy the Xperia 1 VIII, turn off the AI Camera Assistant immediately. Use the Pro mode. Learn how to take a photo the old-fashioned way. Your photos will be better for it. And Sony? Please, for the love of good photography, go back to the drawing board. This isn’t the way forward.

Person holding a Sony Xperia phone with a blurry, overexposed photo of a tree on the screen, looking frustrated Sony Xperia phone blurry photo frustrated user


Originally reported by www.theverge.com. Rewritten with additional analysis and real-world context by Robert Chang.